http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/issue/feed Russian Cardiology Bulletin / Kardiologicheskii Vestnik2025-09-09T21:13:01+03:00Сергей Анатольевич Бойцовinfo@cardioweb.ruOpen Journal Systems<p>The journal Cardiological Bulletin was founded in 1985 as the bulletin of the All-Russian Scientific Research Center of the USSR Academy of Medical Sciences. Resumed in 2006. Currently, it is the main specialized print publication throughout the Russian Federation.</p> <p>Goals and objectives Journal:</p> <p>It serves as a source of relevant and useful information on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases for the entire medical community.</p> <p>It publishes scientific articles, reviews, lectures, and clinical research results on heart and vascular diseases, as well as on fundamental and clinical issues of cardiology.</p> <p>Publishes a calendar of scientific events. It is designed for researchers, cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, specialists in all related areas of internal medicine, including internists, general practitioners, family doctors, as well as specialists in the field of physico-chemical biology and physiology.</p> <p>The articles published in it cover not only all areas of modern cardiology, but also address topical issues of related specialties, and are of undoubted clinical interest and meet strict scientific criteria.</p> <p>The Cardiological Bulletin is distributed free of charge at specialized medical events, and a subscription is available.</p> <p>The journal is included in the first quartile (category K1) of the list of leading peer-reviewed scientific journals and publications of the Higher Attestation Commission of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (HAC RF), in which the main scientific results of dissertations for the degree of doctor and Candidate of medical sciences should be published, upon the fact that the publication meets the established Requirements.</p> <p>Branches of science and/or groups of scientific specialties according to the Nomenclature of the Higher Attestation Commission: 1.5.4 – Biochemistry (medical sciences); 1.5.22 – Cell Biology (Medical Sciences); 3.1.1 – X–ray Endovascular Surgery (Medical Sciences); 3.1.15 - Cardiovascular Surgery (Medical Sciences); 3.1.20 – Cardiology (Medical Sciences); 3.1.25 – Radiation diagnostics (Medical Sciences)</p>http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/582Current trends in organizing the care for patients with acquired heart valve disease2025-09-09T21:12:44+03:00Olga Leonidovna Barbarashreception@kemcardio.ruIrina Lyapinazaviirina@mail.ru<p>Despite advances in research of heart valve disease pathophysiology and active introduction of miniinvasive correction of this disease, heart valve diseases are still poorly diagnosed pathology. These diseases are detected in delayed stages, and there is still inequality in diagnostic and treatment technologies in different regions of the world and our country. In this review, we analyzed<br>epidemiological data on various heart valve diseases, modern phenotype of these patients and factors associated with changes<br>of phenotype. The main positions and limitations in organizing the medical care for these patients are presented. A particular attention is focused on importance of “valve cardiac team” making decisions on management in complex and controversial cases,<br>as well as in comorbid patients with heart valve disease</p>2025-03-05T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/597Valve-sparing approaches and valved conduits for aortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome. Meta-analysis of immediate and long-term results2025-09-09T21:12:46+03:00Ruslan Isaevrmisaev@gmail.comRoman Komarovkomarov_r_n@staff.sechenov.ruNikolai Torchinskytorchinskiy_n_v@staff.sechenov.ruAndrey Gerasimov andr-gerasim@yandex.ruRoman Polibinolibin_r_v@staff.sechenov.ruYuri Vyazovichenko vyazovichenko_yu_e@staff.sechenov.ruMaxim Tkachev tkachev_m_i@staff.sechenov.ruYuri Belov belov_yu_v@staff.sechenov.ru<p>Valve-sparing procedures in aortic root surgery demonstrate favorable short-term and long-term results. At the same time, the feasibility of valve-sparing procedures in patients with Marfan syndrome is questionable. This meta-analysis compares the immediate<br>and long-term results of valve-sparing approaches and valved conduits in aortic root surgery for patients with Marfan syndrome.<br>Data searching was performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases. The primary endpoints were<br>redo surgery rate and mortality in long-term period. Long-term aortic insufficiency (AI) +3/+4 was also estimated as a primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included surgery for acute aortic dissection type A, 30-day mortality, thromboembolism, endocarditis and bleeding. Meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations 2020. In-hospital mortality<br>was similar (OR 3.46; 95% CI 0.92—12.92; I2=0%; p=0.07). In long-term period, thromboembolism (OR 2.77; 95% CI 1.44—5.33;<br>I2=0%; p=0.002), endocarditis (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.18—8.61; I2=0%; p=0.02), bleeding (OR 3.46; 95% CI 1.76—6.77; I2=0%;<br>p=0.0003) and mortality (OR 3.18; 95% CI 1.8—5.63; I2=12%; p<0.0001) were significantly more common after implantation<br>of valved conduits. In long-term period, aortic insufficiency +3/+4 was more common after reimplantation (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.05—<br>0.52; I2=5%; p=0.002). In our study, valve-sparing procedures have advantage regarding the incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. However, long-term freedom from severe aortic insufficiency was higher after implantation of valved conduits</p>2025-03-08T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/603Endovascular correction of lesions of coronary arteries and coronary artery bypass grafts in patients with coronary artery disease with recurrent ischemia after surgical myocardial revascularization2025-09-09T21:12:47+03:00Gleb Borshchev mmcc@zdrav.mos.ruDmitry Ermakov ermakov.hs@gmail.comAnastasia Vakhrameeva dan103@mail.ruDaniil Ulbashev dan103@mail.ru<p>Despite the modern optimal drug therapy and various surgical methods, coronary artery disease is currently one of the most significant problems of medicine. The risk of recurrent myocardial ischemia increases in long-term period after coronary artery bypass surgery, especially in patients with diffuse coronary lesions. The main factors of such results are progression of atherosclerosis and dysfunction of coronary artery grafts. Repeated myocardial revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention<br>is the safest and optimal option. However, there is currently no unambiguous and generally accepted opinion about endovascular treatment of such patients with diffuse coronary lesions.<br>Objective. To estimate the efficacy and safety of endovascular correction of coronary artery and bypass graft lesions in patients with<br>coronary artery disease, diffuse coronary artery lesions and myocardial ischemia recurrence after coronary artery bypass surgery.<br>Material and methods. The study included 106 patients with recurrent myocardial ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery<br>who underwent treatment in 2013—2020. Coronary artery stenting was performed in the 1st group (55 (51.9%) patients), and graft<br>stenting was carried out in the 2nd group (51 (48.1%) patients). Clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar. The endpoints were mortality, restenosis after endovascular correction, myocardial infarction and MACE after 1 and 12 months.<br>Results. In the 1st group, lesion length and number of implanted stents were significantly greater: 25.7 [20.9; 31.6] and 18.8 [17.2;<br>22.1] mm p=0.023; 121 and 71 stents, respectively. Transradial access was more common in the 1st group (24 (43.6%)<br>and 9 (17.6%), respectively, p=0.004). In long–term period, mortality and restenosis rate were slightly higher in the 2nd group<br>(4 (7.3%) and 6 (11.8%) deaths, p=0,434; 7 (10.8%) and 9 (16.7%) cases of restenosis, respectively, p=0.352). The MACE rate<br>was similar (11 (20.0%) and 15 (29.4%) cases, respectively, p=0.265).<br>Conclusion. Stenting of native coronary arteries in patients with coronary artery disease, diffuse coronary lesions and recurrent<br>myocardial ischemia after coronary artery bypass surgery demonstrates a tendency to better results within 1 and 12 months regarding restenosis, myocardial infarction rate and mortality compared to stenting of coronary artery bypass grafts.</p>2025-03-09T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/602Long-term results of delayed endovascular treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with ectasia of infarct-related coronary artery2025-09-09T21:12:50+03:00Andrey Zhuravlev zhuravlev_and@inbox.ruAlexey Azarov Azarov_al@mail.ruMaria Glezer 287ast@mail.ruSergey Semitko semitko_s_p@staff.sechenov.ruAnton Analeev zhuravlev_and@inbox.ruAlexey Kudakov kudakov_a_a@mail.ruNino Tsereteli zhuravlev_and@inbox.ruDavid Ioseliani zhuravlev_and@inbox.ru<p>Objective. To evaluate the safety, short-term and long-term outcomes after delayed and early stenting in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ectasia of infarct-related coronary artery.<br>Material and methods. A multiple-center retrospective study included 80 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ectasia of infarct-related coronary artery between 2014 and 2022. Of these, 50 patients underwent immediate stenting,<br>and 30 patients underwent delayed intervention.<br>Results. Delayed stenting for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with ectasia of infarct-related coronary<br>artery improves reperfusion data, such as TIMI grade of epicardial coronary blood flow (p=0.02) and myocardial perfusion (MBG<br>grade) (p<0.001). The same was true for combined angiographic endpoint TIMI-3 and MBG 2-3 (p=0.005), as well as ST segment<br>resolution ≥70% (p=0.022). After 59 months, the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was lower after delayed endovascular intervention (p=0.047). This was mainly due to lower risk of hospitalization for CHF (p=0.036) and recurrent myocardial infarction (p=0.179).<br>Conclusion. Delayed endovascular treatment is safe in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ectasia of infarct-related coronary artery. This strategy is also associated with lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events in long-term<br>period, mainly due to lower incidence of hospitalizations for chronic heart failure.</p>2025-03-09T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/606Prediction of no-reflow phenomenon in endovascular treatment of patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction2025-09-09T21:12:51+03:00Evgeny Bessonov Ewgenijbessonov@yandex.ruAndrey Shishkevich Ewgenijbessonov@yandex.ruSergey Mikhailov Ewgenijbessonov@yandex.ruVyacheslav Kravchuk Ewgenijbessonov@yandex.ru<p>No-reflow phenomenon is common in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing coronary artery stenting. There is still no generally accepted risk stratification model for these patients.<br>Objective. To identify predictors and regression model for no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI.<br>Material and methods. A retrospective study included 143 STEMI patients who underwent infarct-related artery stenting. We estimated predictors of no-reflow phenomenon and developed appropriate prognostic model. The control group of 50 people tested performance of the model. Results. Preoperative TIMI grade of antegrade blood flow < 0—1, TIMI thrombus grade 4—5, structure of coronary arteries, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, serum glucose, period between painful attack and percutaneous coronary intervention, as well as previous diabetes mellitus are factors influencing the likelihood of no-reflow phenomenon. The mathematical model has high predictive value (AUC 0.86, p<0.01).<br>Conclusion. The main pattern of no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing PCI is a combination of distal embolism<br>with severity of inflammatory process. This corresponds to pathophysiological hypothesis of this complication after myocardial<br>revascularization.</p>2025-03-11T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/608Effect of internal carotid artery stenting on brain vascularization2025-09-09T21:12:52+03:00David Ioseliani doc.sandodze@mail.ruTamara Sandoze doc.sandodze@mail.ruNaim Yousef doc.sandodze@mail.ruMadina Durzhinskaya doc.sandodze@mail.ruElina Kazaryan doc.sandodze@mail.ruSergey Semitko doc.sandodze@mail.ruNino Tsereteli doc.sandodze@mail.ruVladislav Pavlov doc.sandodze@mail.ruDanizat Masaeva doc.sandodze@mail.ru<p>Cerebral microcirculation after internal carotid artery (ICA) stenting is an insufficiently explored and relevant area of research.<br>To address this question, we studied blood circulation in the eye as a part of central nervous system supplied through ICA.<br>Objective. To evaluate the effect of ICA stenting on eye vascularization in early period.<br>Materials and methods. The study included 92 patients with unilateral or bilateral ICA stenosis ≥70% who underwent stenting<br>of one ICA. Prior to the intervention and 3—7 days later, patients underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT). We measured<br>microvascular network density using VAD (image binarization method) and VSD (skeletonizing method) modes in superficial<br>(SCP) and deep (DCP) layers of macular retina in the area 6×6 mm (VAD SCP MZ 6×6 mm, VAD DCP MZ 6x6 mm, VSD SCP MZ<br>6x6 mm, VSD DCP MZ 6x6 mm) and in peripapillary (RPC) region in the area 4x4 mm (VAD RPC 4×4 mm, VSD RPC 4×4 mm).<br>We distinguished 2 groups depending on eye lateralization: group 1 — ipsilateral eyes, group 2 — contralateral eyes. There were<br>no differences in baseline OCTA parameters between ipsilateral and contralateral eyes.<br>Results. ICA stenting was followed by significant increase of VAD DCP MZ 6×6 mm and VSD DCP MZ 6×6 mm in ipsilateral<br>(p=0.01 and p<0.01, respectively) and contralateral eyes (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively). This indicated better microcirculation in deep retinal plexus.<br>Conclusion. Monitoring of retinal vascularization may be convenient for assessing the efficacy of ICA stenting regarding brain<br>perfusion.</p>2025-03-09T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/610Autopericardial neocuspidization in patients with small aortic annulus2025-09-09T21:12:53+03:00Nikolay Kurasov drognevo@gmail.comRoman Komarov drognevo@gmail.comAlisher Ismailbayev drognevo@gmail.comAndrey Dzyundzya drognevo@gmail.comOleg Ognev drognevo@gmail.comBoris Tlisov drognevo@gmail.com<p>Introduction. Some patients with aortic valve (AV) disease have small aortic annulus. This anatomical feature can lead to prosthesispatient mismatch after AV replacement.<br>Objective. To improve postoperative outcomes in patients with AV disease and small aortic annulus.Material and methods. We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients with small aortic annulus divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n=49) —<br>autopericardial neocuspidization (AVNeo) of the aortic valve, group 2 (n=28) — aortic root enlargement and standard aortic valve<br>replacement using mechanical or biological prostheses. Analysis of comorbidities found no differences between groups.<br>Results. In-hospital mortality was similar (2,1% (n=1) and 7.1% (n=2), respectively, p=0.321). Survival rate was 96% and 74%, respectively (p=0.04), cumulative freedom from MACE — 95% and 53% (p=0.03), freedom from redo surgery — 95% and 80%, respectively (p=0.381). Duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischemia was similar: 113,84±36,03 vs 116.61±25.01 min,<br>(p=0.71); 86.74±23.19 vs 91.04±22.71 min, respectively (p=0.404). The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations was significantly higher in group 2: 6 (21.4%) vs 2 (4.1%) cases (p=0.039). In early postoperative period, transvalvular peak blood flow<br>velocity (p<0.01) and pressure gradient (p<0.01) significantly decreased in the 1st group compared to the 2nd group. Mean transvalvular pressure gradient in mid-term period was significantly lower in the AVNeo group (p=0.001).<br>Conclusion. AVNeo in patients with small annulus demonstrates the advantages over aortic root enlargement regarding mid-term<br>results due to better hemodynamic parameters after surgery.</p> <p> </p>2025-03-09T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/612Features of drug therapy in patients with chronic heart failure in real clinical practice (chronic heart failure registry in the Tyumen region)2025-09-09T21:12:54+03:00Natalia Lazareva A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruAnna Airapetian A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruOleg Reitblat A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruEvgeny Mezhonov A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruEvgeny Sorokin A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruJulia Prints A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruJulia Osmolovskaya A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruIgor ZhirovA.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruSergey Tereshchenko A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ruSergey Boytsov A.A.Airapetian@yandex.ru<p>In recent years, the capabilities of modern therapy in improving the prognosis of CHF have changed significantly. This is largely due to introduction of new drugs: angiotensin II receptor antagonists with neprilysin inhibitor and sodium glucose transporter type 2 inhibitors.<br>The purpose of the study was to analyze drug therapy in patients with CHF depending on phenotype, functional class and stage<br>of CHF who presented in hospitals of the Tyumen region between January 2020 and July 2023. We analyzed data on 7303 patients with CHF class I—IV. Mean age was 69.8±9.8 years. Men comprised 40.6% (n=2962). There were different stages and phenotypes of CHF. The compliance of drug therapy with modern clinical guidelines was estimated. No interventions in management<br>of patients were expected. Examination and treatment were completely determined by attending physicians.<br>Despite common use of certain classes of drugs included in optimal drug therapy, there are insufficient prescriptions of quadruple therapy (sodium glucose transporter type 2 inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists with neprilysin inhibitor, β blockers,<br>mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) and individual prescriptions (sodium glucose transporter type 2 inhibitors, otensin II receptor antagonists with neprilysin inhibitor). This can affect further course of CHF in this region.</p>2025-03-10T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/613Non-fluoroscopic ablation of supraventricular tachycardia — results of a new approach2025-09-09T21:12:56+03:00Maxim Podyanov makassoroksem@gmail.comOleg Sapelnikov makassoroksem@gmail.comDmitry Cherkashin makassoroksem@gmail.comDarin Ardus makassoroksem@gmail.comAlexander Kulikov makassoroksem@gmail.comAnna Vereshchagina makassoroksem@gmail.comIgor Grishin makassoroksem@gmail.comTatiana Uskach makassoroksem@gmail.comAnton Omelianenko makassoroksem@gmail.comHasanbeg Ramazanov makassoroksem@gmail.comMakedon Demurchev makassoroksem@gmail.comAndrey Shiryaev makassoroksem@gmail.comRenat Akchurin makassoroksem@gmail.com<p>Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) using exclusively intracardiac ultrasound compared to conventional fluoroscopic approach.<br>Material and methods. There were 170 patients with SVT (85 patients in each group): 128 ones with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and 42 ones with atrioventricular re-entry tachycardia (AVRT). In the non-fluoroscopic group, ablation<br>was performed under intracardiac ultrasound guidance. The follow-up period was 12 months.<br>Results. Intraoperative success rate was 100% in both groups. Freedom from recurrence was comparable among patients with<br>AVNRT (90.6% vs. 93.75%, p=0.74) and AVRT (95.2% vs. 95.2%). Safety of procedures was also similar (AVNRT 4.7% vs. 0%,<br>p=0.24; AVRT 0% vs. 0%). Fluoroscopy was used in none patient who underwent the procedure under intracardiac ultrasound<br>guidance (p < 0.001). However, surgery time and overall RF-ablation time was significantly shorter in the non-fluoroscopic group<br>among patients with AVNRT.<br>Conclusion. Catheter ablation of SVT under intracardiac ultrasound control is possible without fluoroscopy and electrophysiological navigation. This procedure is effective and safe.</p>2025-03-10T16:08:47+03:00Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Cardiology Bulletin / Kardiologicheskii Vestnikhttp://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/623Atrial cardiopathy. Diagnosis of causes, treatment of complications and surgical correction of cardiac remodeling2025-09-09T21:12:58+03:00Julia Fedotkina juliafedotkina@mail.ruEvgeny Yevseyev juliafedotkina@mail.ruAndrey Komarov juliafedotkina@mail.ruMaxim Makeev juliafedotkina@mail.ruJulia Frolovajuliafedotkina@mail.ruElizaveta Panchenko lizapanchenko@mail.ruMikhail Fomin juliafedotkina@mail.ruYashar Aidamirov juliafedotkina@mail.ruVictoria Savina juliafedotkina@mail.ru<p>The relationship between atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic syndrome and, above all, ischemic stroke is well known. Atrial<br>cardiomyopathy is important for understanding the mechanisms of thrombogenicity. In this report, we consider diagnostic algorithm, surgical treatment of a patient with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic complications, severe mitral insufficiency and atriomegaly following myocarditis. Structural and functional cardiac remodeling with subsequent arrhythmias and heart failure is a serious problem in modern cardiology and cardiac surgery. Extensive cardiac surgery is extremely difficult and does not always lead to significant clinical improvement. However, quality of life is quite low without surgical treatment<br>in such patients and associated with high risk of adverse cardiovascular events.</p>2025-03-11T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c) http://ojs2.rucml.ru/index.php/ms-cardiovest/article/view/621Renat Suleymanovich Akchurin (April 2, 1946 — October 6, 2024)2025-09-09T21:13:01+03:00editorial staff of the journal editorial staff of the journalinfo@mediasphera.ru<p>obituary</p>2025-03-11T00:00:00+03:00Copyright (c)